|
|
Posted by anthonyberet on 10/23/05 16:25
kim wrote:
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> news:3s05j6Fl9q9oU1@individual.net...
>
>>The aargument used in defense is that the files on the defendant's coputer
>>could have been from their own CD collection, rather than downloads, and
>>that the RIAA's lackeys did not observe any of the files being transferred
>>to anyone else.
>
>
> That's even worse. The prosecutors will argue the files were transferred
> from CD to PC specifically for the purpose of uploading. Out of the frying
> pan and into the fire.
>
If trnsferred from CD, it would mean that the user had not downloaded
them, which is half the potential accusation out of the way.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|