Posted by Dave D on 10/11/29 11:39

"Technobarbarian" <Technobarbarian-ztopzpam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:UiCGf.57073$V.21061@fed1read04...

>
> Obviously. Much like Kazaa WinMX is dead, but the corpse keeps
> flailing around and probably will for some time to come. It's sad to
> watch, particularly with all the fans that can't let it die in peace.

Works very well for me, thanks.

>Right now: Shareaza, eMule plus and uTorrent are the best available. Next
>week, who knows? Evolution marches on. Getting all attached and drippy
>about any one program is ridiculous. Hell, getting all attached to p2p
>doesn't make much sense either. For music files binary usenet groups and a
>good binary harvester are often a better choice.

Binary newsgroups better than WinMX for music? In what way exactly? Usenet
offers a pathetic range of material compared to WinMX. For people who want
the latest album from current bands, binary NGs might work well enough and
offer fast downloads. However, for anyone wanting older, deleted or rare
material, WinMX is unbeatable.

Dave

• Next in forum: Re: Podcasts not listed in iPod under Music->Podcasts
• Prev in forum: Re: Had it with WinMX
• Thread view: Re: Had it with WinMX

[Reply to this message]