|
|
Posted by Phillip Kyle on 10/06/47 11:30
peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) verbally sodomised in
news:djmbqc$46j$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> Be still! and revere Phillip Kyle, who blessed us with their presence on
> 25 Oct 2005...
>
>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) verbally sodomised in
>> news:djlumc$set$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> Be still! and revere Phillip Kyle, who blessed us with their presence
>>> on 25 Oct 2005...
>>>
>>>> Ted Capuano <lx3nwn7@kzhg6.com> verbally sodomised in
>>>> news:ko0rl1tncp7t19943jqcndm65mj5ib0htb@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:23:52 +0000 (UTC), "Richard Dewsbery"
>>>>> <richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, it's that special time again. So please do not feed the
>>>>>>trolls. Particularly the cross-posting variety.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you the Richard Dewsbery who wrote this to the now exposed
>>>>> private mailing list "ng_abuse"?
>>>>>
>>>>> <Quote>
>>>>>
>>>>> ISPs have to tread warily where posters using their services are
>>>>> libelling other people. Although I am not a media lawyer, I would
>>>>> cite as authority for the proposition that an ISP can be liable for
>>>>> acts of its subscribers the case of Godfrey vs Demon Internet.
>>>>> Although the case was ultimately settled out of court by Demon, a
>>>>> first instance ruling had held that they could be liable for
>>>>> carrying posts authored by a third party if they didn't remove the
>>>>> posts when asked from the servers.
>>>>>
>>>>> The effect of this is to make all ISPs think carefully about whether
>>>>> they want bloody nuisances as customers, as each time the nuisance
>>>>> posts something insulting the victim can complain, and if the
>>>>> message isn't deleted at source, the ISP gets to pay damages. After
>>>>> a few complaints from different individuals, the ISP is well advised
>>>>> to pull the account rather than risk missing a few deletions and
>>>>> getting whacked by a High Court defamation suit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I gather that some of the current crop of most virulent trolls may
>>>>> be real people, with an academic access to the net. Either the
>>>>> academic establishment is acting as its own ISP, or it has an
>>>>> outside ISP - it matters not, a few cease and desist letters and
>>>>> either ought to pull the offenders' net priveleges. Regardless of
>>>>> what certain news server admins may think about it (letters
>>>>> involving lawyers in suits usually end up on more important desks).
>>>>>
>>>>> What we need is concrete evidence of how the messages are being
>>>>> posted, and by whom and to what servers; some innocent victims who
>>>>> have been the subject of defamatory postings; and some sharply-
>>>>> worded letters before action to the ISP or establishment through
>>>>> which the abuse has been posted. Sledgehammer to crack a nut, but
>>>>> it seems that the only other solutions require us to put up with the
>>>>> little gits. I'll happily help out with any letters before action -
>>>>> with the provisos that I'm not an expert on defamation, nor will I
>>>>> be involved in any litigation either as claimant or representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> </Quote>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, he's also the kind gentleman who sent me this nice email:
>>>>
>>>> <Quote>
>>>>
>>>> From : Richard Dewsbery <richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk>
>>>> Sent : Saturday, January 3, 2004 1:07 PM
>>>> To : <philkyle2003@hotmail.com>
>>>> Subject : Crossposting Twats
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>> Received: from dswu232.btconnect.com ([193.113.154.43]) by
>>>> mc11-f7.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 3 Jan
>>>> 2004 05:09:02 -0800 Received: from xpbox (actually host
>>>> 242.116.120.213.in-addr.arpa) by dswu232 with SMTP-CUST (XT-PP); Sat,
>>>> 3 Jan 2004 13:07:38 +0000 X-Message-Info:
>>>> JGTYoYF78jExmRhYTKFgsFwAHHwYGw7B X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>>>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>>>> Return-Path: richard@dewsbery.freeserve.co.uk
>>>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2004 13:09:03.0051 (UTC)
>>>> FILETIME=[C26DC9B0:01C3D1FA]
>>>>
>>>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008D_01C3D1FA.834FA550"
>>>>
>>>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>>
>>>> Are you the twat that is cross-posting all sorts of garbage to half
>>>> the UK newsgroups, or an unwittin g victim of some other twat using
>>>> your website address?
>>>>
>>>> R M Dewsbery
>>>>
>>>> </Quote>
>>>
>>> Looks like a clown we should go after :-)
>>>
>> Indeedy. Let's just say URC for good measure.
>>
>> Imagine if I was a completely innocent poster with that email address
>> and that landed in it. Do you think I'd reply?
>
> I can't help but feel that I would be committing suicide if my name was
> R M Dingleberry.
>
I'm sure he got teased at school. I bet he became a hall monitor so he
could wreak his vengance by being a jobsworth.
--
Phil Kyle
http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/
"The truly racist person is one Helene Rudlin, who admits it."
- Neil Barker <MPG.1c47999866a4baf798976c@127.0.0.1>
"I wonder - is there perhaps some form of cosmetic surgery we can pay for,
so that Helene can actually become a coon ?"
- Neil Barker <MPG.1c479b87e7a43ce989770@127.0.0.1>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|