|
|
Posted by Tumbleweed on 12/11/05 20:56
"Mr Wiffy" <nospamthanks@spamfree.com> wrote in message
news:fKWmf.312$yX1.1070@news-1.opaltelecom.net...
>
> "Tumbleweed" <thisaccountneverread@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3vun10F17s0kcU1@individual.net...
> |
> | "Mr Wiffy" <nospamthanks@spamfree.com> wrote in message
> | news:zSkmf.283$yX1.899@news-1.opaltelecom.net...
> | >
> | > "Tumbleweed" <thisaccountneverread@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> | > news:3vtr11F17ddvlU1@individual.net...
> | >
> | > snip
> | >
> | > | > Sorted now, replacement on it's way..although why they sent it out
> in
> | > that
> | > | > condition in the first place is beyond me.
> | > | >
> | > | > Daz
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | because most people arent anal enough for it to make a difference?
> | >
> | > I would not call it anal at all. The condition was totally
> unacceptable,
> | > and nobody in their right mind would simply accept it in that state. I
> | > think
> | > TTH did the right thing, and CD-Wow obviously agreed with his point.
> In
> | > my
> | > experience they are very good at rectifying any, albeit very rare,
> | > problems.
> | >
> | > Ian
> | >
> |
> | an upside down label taht wouldnt be noticed even on display if you
> turned
> | the case upside down? In 5 or so years time there wont even *be* labels.
> The
> | important thing is the contents of the dvd not the case its in.
>
> We will have to agree to disagree. I will say that as a Nation, we are far
> too excepting of poor quality goods and service, and only when we raise
> our
> expectations (like the Americans for instance) will standards rise. The
> cover sounds more of a botch, than merely an inverted cover, and I would
> seriously question the lack of any insert (my Ep3 does have a four page
> booklet insert for the record, so this would seem to be a strong
> indication
> of an incomplete edition).
>
> If you would accept this standard of new goods, then so be it. But I
> would
> rather expect something of a reasonable "new" quality (and with a DVD that
> would be fully sealed in 99% of cases) - To describe someone as anal
> because
> they have reasonable expectations when purchasing new goods is very harsh
> and unfair.
>
> Clearly we all have differing standards here, but to expect something to
> appear new and un-tampered with is not a fault on the part of that
> individual.
>
> Ian
>
AFAIK from the original description, it was new and untouched, its just that
the label was on upside down.
--
Tumbleweed
email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|