|
|
Posted by Jules on 12/29/05 13:42
"Geoff Leonard" <Geoff.Leonard@imdb.com> wrote in message
news:SJx+XZAYl7sDFwFd@imdb.com...
> I'm thinking of getting a 23" monitor. They are all *very* expensive,
> from what I can see from the net, though obviously Apple / Sony are the
> standouts in this direction with their extra quality.
>
> However, if all I really want it for is a bigger display (I work from
> home and it would make it easier) would it not be much more economical
> to buy a 23" or even a 26" TV which can also be used as a PC monitor?
> For instance, I've read a good review of a Samsung 26" HD ready (as a
> bonus) TV with a PC input, and it's 300 cheaper than an Apple 23"
> monitor.
>
> So, what am I missing here? I could get a 26" monitor which doubles as
> an HD ready integrated digital TV for about 650 or a 23" monitor which
> doesn't double as a TV for 950.
>
> Is it that the monitor has a better screen res? If so, that doesn't
> worry me. I'm looking more for processing data than creating web-sites,
> watching DVDs and editing photos.
>
> Or is it something else?
>
> Clue me in, please, Santa!!
>
> --
> Geoff
Hi Geoff
I am a photographer and have in my studio a 23" apple as well as a 24" Dell
which is only around 600 , The apple is slightly better but the Dell is
definitly 90% of what the apple is,
I also have a HD plasma in my studio and the PC picture is not anywhere near
the quality of the dell or Apple.
if your looking for cheaper than the Apple I would gofor the Dell
Ultrasharpe 24" its just brilliany
Jules
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|