|
|
Posted by Major ChrisB on 01/13/06 12:29
"Ivan G" <ivangorski@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1136976590.296085.317480@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> what you talking about? If you want hardcore lesbian sex and big pussy
> close ups then you should be buying a porn movie. I thought the girls
> looked very nice and the Daleks were pretty much the same as in the 60s
> Dr Who series..also the dalek voices are pretty close..... I think
> you've missed the whole point of the film.
>
> Think about this. Do you really imagine someone is going to invest 10s
> of 1000s creating expensive sets, employing top actresses to get naked
> (like who for instance?), etc, etc to make a film that is quite likely
> going to be banned straight away??? also for a film with such a limited
> press run of just 1000 and would never get sindication. Get real,
> you're living in dream land.
>
> When you take all that into account then the end effort is pretty
> amazing.
It's supposed to be a soft porn film, it's barely that. The original posted
asked iff he should spend 35 on it....he should....i told him why.
Wheather some bloke hand built the daleks and sets and spend his hard earned
cash and a lot of effort putting it together really has no bearing on the
fact that it sucked. I'm not saying the should have spend 10's of 1000's
making the hting....I'm saying they shouldn't have bothered at all coz it
has no value. It's not frightening, it's not bad enough that it's funny,
it's not good enough that it's entertaining and it's not sexual enough to
have a wank over.
As a film it has absolutly no value and if you think it has some value to
anyone except the guy who made it and got someone paying 35 to buy it then
please explain it to me coz i think your living in a dream world...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|