|
|
Posted by POD {ҿ} on 01/15/06 00:25
"/\\/\\arc" <yada@yada.com> wrote in
news:dqc35d$dp$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com:
> Now, I know that copying a DVD is illegal, but would it be considered
> just as illegal to record a film using Sky+ and then transferring it
> onto DVD using a standalone DVD recorder?
>
> The end result would be pretty much identical seeing as Sky Movies
> don't have adverts. I guess you wouldn't get the 5.1 audio (or would
> you?).
>
> This started as a discussion in the pub tonight, so I thought I'd see
> what the wise men of UMD had to say ;)
>
> Marc
>
>
It was the same with VHS, you are only meant to record stuff to watch
later, if you are unable to watch it at the time, and there is a time
limit to how long you can keep it.....but I don't recall it ever
becoming law, mainly because MP's found it anal and unpolicable anyhow,
waste of time and money.
Problem is, the Sky transmission will be even worse quality than a 4.5G
DVD rip, with all their JPEG blocking, as they are using a very low
bitrate to transmit.Even with films they do with DD5.1
--
Thank you kindly
POD {ҿ}
"Girls, don't you wish your fella was hot like me?"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|