|
|
Posted by David McCall on 08/28/05 15:16
"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xpr7t.net> wrote in message
news:11h3km3g4rg06d9@corp.supernews.com...
> "Jason/Tina" wrote ...
>> Can you tell any diffenences between shooting in standard definition and
>> converting to HD via editing than shooting via a HD camera.
>
> Yes, most certainly. If you couldn't see the differences,
> there wouldn't be much point to HD, would there?
>
A "no-brainer" indeed.
Perhaps a more useful question would be:
Can you see any difference shooting HD, or HDV, and
down-converting it to SD as opposed to shooting SD?
I'd guess that down-converted HD might have a
chance of being better (the fact that you would be
using a $100,000 camera might be the key :-).
HDV id more iffy partially due to the compression,
and partially due to the inexpensive cameras.
David
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|