|
|
Posted by Jona Vark on 09/08/05 16:35
"William Davis" <newvideo@fastq.com> wrote in message
news:newvideo-2737E9.12342806092005@news.west.cox.net...
> In article <4fhTe.29373$YC1.14385@fe08.lga>,
> TonyP <arpierre@hooptonline.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > I have not worked in HDV, so can't speak on it. You can go to the LE
> > forums where there are people that have ACTUALLY used it. The system
> > requirements are high, very high.
> > http://tinyurl.com/8wct9 and search for HDV (or similiar topic) and see
> > what comes up. Also, this link will explain what Edition can do within
> > the HDV format and what the system requirements are. It is a .pdf (Adobe
> > Acrobat) file http://tinyurl.com/dk3vn
> >
>
> Well, I am working with HDV so I can.
>
> The idea that "system requirements are high, very high", just isn't true.
>
> I'm happily editing HDV footage on my Dual G4 Mac with Final Cut Pro HD.
> This is three-year-old dual 1-gig machine. NOT anywhere close to "state
> of the art."
>
> The central truth about HDV that escapes people who haven't worked with
> it is that compressed HDV data files are often SMALLER than
> corresponding standard def DV files.
>
that's because they are compressed! Once you unpack 'em and try to play or
edit with a timeline the data throughput requirements rise. We're cutting
HDV on an older 2Gig Dual Xeon. And while going 'round and round with
Cineform we were told our machine wasn't fast enough. Even though we were
editing with no problems at the time.. So I think there is definately a
misunderstanding.. even at some of the companies that develop HDV products..
or at least their support folks..
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|