|
|
Posted by doc on 09/28/05 19:03
we did find a solution but just using canopus procoder and that worked and
wah lah the dvd output looks just like the mini DV tape and thus we're good
to go (although we wanted to use liquid edition for this event that will
last for 3 years and not canopus) o well, as they say, "things happen" :o)
doc
"GMAN" <glenzabr@xmission.com> wrote in message
news:dhcmsg$no2$1@news.xmission.com...
> In article <9zpZe.1579$%L4.46@trndny02>, "doc" <doc@drdimento.net> wrote:
>>nope. actually it looks great on the pc and in the camcorder pop out lcd,
>>but on the tv it's terrible, very noticable, and actually so bad it
>>distracts from the viewing, jerky, rachetting, or fragmented, (not
>>pixelated) but almost like every other frame (or a few frames) are missing
>>between each of those that are seen. almost like an old silent picture or
>>one of those hand movies that you sorta fan. know what i mean?
>>
>>lacing??? hmmmmm how would i know? and how to fix?
>>
>>doc
>>
>
> It almost sounds like your captrue device or its capture codec is the
> getting
> the "field order" backwards.
>
>
>>"AnthonyR" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>news:wogZe.842$Fc4.506@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>>>
>>> "doc" <doc@drdimento.net> wrote in message
>>> news:7Y6Ze.3780$L15.3061@trndny01...
>>>> me too. geez.
>>>>
>>>> u know i'm struggling with something right now. ever capture some DV
>>>> and
>>>> it views fine in the software then when it's exported (or make -
>>>> whichever is preferred :o) to DVD the images are choppy when there are
>>>> pans or zooms in and out?
>>>>
>>>> ideas?
>>>>
>>>> doc
>>>>
>>> Doc,
>>> you mean when you view the mpeg encoded images on the PC?
>>> Cause that could be normal interlacing you are seeing, that isn't
>>> visible
>>> when viewed on regular tv after it's a dvd.
>>> In the very beginning of dvd making, I experienced the same, and it
>>> drove
>>> me nuts till someone told me it was nothing.
>>> Some of the cheap encoders, nowadays add a feature called de-interlacing
>>> or progressive capture, both avoid this effect that I am talking
>>> about when viewed on a computer screen in the editing program. But maybe
>>> you are talking about something else?
>>>
>>> AnthonyR.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|