|
|
Posted by Toby on 10/06/83 11:28
What about a TBC? I guess it has limits, but it might worth a try.
Toby
"Steve Guidry" <steveguidry@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4nc0f.8894$q1.1768@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>I agree that it was a servo problem in teh record section. The
>predecessors
> to these decks (the 410's) were notorious for this problem. BUt this is
> the
> first time I noticed it on these.
>
> How about using some keyframe stabilizer or tracking feature of Photoshop
> or
> some other program ? Will this work ?
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> "Pat Horridge" <pat@remove-spam.vet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dhr4t2$rmq$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> "Steve Guidry" <steveguidry@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:85R%e.7026$vw6.3709@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>> >I recently shot a VHS tape (no sneers, please) (grin) with my
>> >ooooolllld
>> > camera and its JVC RS-s411 dockable. The room was hot and humid.
>> >
>> > I didn't get a dew indication or shutoff, but periodically the camera
> was
>> > surging and then re-locking. This was accompanied by a picture breakup
>> > and
>> > re-lock on the video coming out of the video confidence spigot. This
>> > is
> a
>> > new one for me . . .
>> >
>> > Is there any way to defeat the auto-sensing speed control of a playback
>> > deck
>> > to minimize this problem ? (I'd like to play it at the same constant
>> > speed,
>> > and ignore the speed fluctuations on the playback.) And is this likely
> to
>> > accomplish a smooth playback ?
>> >
>> > Do you have any other suggestions ?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steve Guidry
>>
>> The problem is that during record if the servo lost lock and speeded up
>> or
>> slowed down the rate of frames captured on the tape would now be wrong.
>> Playing back at a contant rate probably wouldn't help.
>> In fact the video heads writing onto tape during those wrong tape speeds
>> will be very difficult if not impossible to re-create at playback.
>>
>> Sounds like a servo fault on the VTR section to me.
>>
>>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|