|
|
Posted by News on 10/26/05 19:57
Why doesn't anybody from this point on simply e-mail Jim Taylor from his web
site and ask him about this topic. I'm just the messenger and I don't have
his link on my site as some kind of advertisement. Just simply a good place,
in my opinion, for people with DVD questions to go to. E-mail Jim Taylor
from his web site at: http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html
"News" <jimmynkimr@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:4mP7f.25762$i31.25094@trnddc08...
>I would still think watching about an hour of video with some photos mixed
>in would be enough for the eyes to make a distinction. Again, I never said
>that the quality would be that of HD, but that those past customers told me
>that the picture quality was great on their HD sets. I would also think
>that being used to watch TV broadcasts, they would be able to recognize any
>differences, especially if it was poor quality. It is true then that a
>DVD-5/9 can be played on an HDTV set with excellent quality.
>
> HD is still based on MPEG-2 compression, although at another format level
> to it. Read from the DVD Forum:
> http://dvdforum.org/hddvd-tech-intro-eng.htm
>
> MPEG can make standard VHS quality video and lets say high resolution
> photo images made into a movie, a much better picture. I'm not beating my
> chest saying that I've got the best on the market. I am however telling
> you that I review a tape before doing it and test the DVD after production
> and there is a difference.
>
> Whether there are adjustments to the brightness, contrast, color and
> saturation during intake to the filtering at MPEG compression, let alone
> DVDit's highest setting for quality, these videos come out looking much
> better than VHS. Hence, digital enhancement via MPEG compression.
>
> When we upgraded to DVDit Pro 6, the stereo sound now boasts a smoother
> and yet deeper bass emission. Sonic has included 5.1 Pass-Through in their
> release of Pro 6. The previous version did not carry the same effects and
> was only 2.0 stereo.
>
> We've done projects for ourselves and in comparison to what we have now to
> what we had, there is a difference in both picture and sound quality.
>
>
> "AnthonyR" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:YgO7f.3160$u43.1760@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>>
>> <mmaker@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>> news:1130258042.711308.211340@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>> News wrote:
>>>> I've
>>>> done many a project for people with HDTV sets on a regular 4.7GB disc
>>>> at a
>>>> 16:9 aspect ratio with crystal clear picture and stereo sound.
>>>
>>> Must be a pretty crappy 'HDTV' if they can't tell the difference
>>> between a standard definition DVD and a real HD signal.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>
>> Most people just can't see all that well to begin with, lol
>> So looking at a 55" picture from 12 feet away is going to look clear to
>> them whether the HDTV details are there or not.
>> HDTV resolution is best seen up close where you can see the details in
>> things like fine print in say a newspaper in the scene
>> etc...But for just plain images the human eyes blurs and makes up info
>> most of the time, that why only 24 fps of film looks
>> like a continuous moving image to us, the brain auto tweens all the
>> missing frames and details.
>>
>> You ever see something from far away and swear it looks like something
>> familiar, only to discover later on when you get up
>> close it's something completely different? Again, the brain is making up
>> missing data...something mpeg can't do just yet. LOL
>>
>> What was my point, oh yes...after a certain point of clarity most people
>> just see a great picture. or some people say.
>> And the younger you are the more you'll appreciate HDTV cause I think
>> your mind hasn't adjusted to making up details for
>> all those years like those who watched regular tv has.
>> IMHO,
>>
>> AnthonyR.
>>
>>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|