|
|
Posted by Rgr on 11/28/05 08:29
Not A Speck Of Cereal wrote:
> As Rôgêr <abuse@your.isp.com> so eloquently put:
> [] Not A Speck Of Cereal wrote:
> [] > Sony Video Vegas vs. Adobe Premier Pro.
> [] >
> [] > Thoughts?
> []
> [] The delimiter between your subject body and your signature is two dashes
> [] followed by one space, then a return.
>
> I'm setting a trend.
>
> Well, I've been posting like this since the early '90s and haven't had
> a complaint (until now). Should I remove the space? Add more dashes?
> What does your netiquette require.
>
> [] Now, got that out of the way, is
> [] there any way to make your question more vague?
>
> I actually had a long post composed with my specific requirements, but
> have found of late that the more general questions bring out the more
> general responses, which was appropriate for me when I posted that, so
> I simplified/
>
> How about this: "gosh, I'm way behind on this and an wondering if
> there's a general consensus as to what of these two editing platforms
> are best?"
>
> [] I like Vegas. Do you like Ford or Chevy?
>
> Neither. My last American new car purchase swore me off of that.
>
> I own Vegas, but it's 3 versions old (catching up), so I was simply
> wondering what the landscape is out there in the range I can afford. I
> can update Vegas for an amount that is only a couple of hundred less
> than I can get a Premier suite for.
>
> [] What is it you're trying to do? Do you already have
> [] any experience with either? Are you expecting to have to work with
> [] either in the near future?
>
> I'm looking for an editing production application to do documentaries,
> mainly, but I'm hoping to venture into other video production genres.
> I want to keep my options open, that way.
>
> Adobe seems to have a pretty nice thing going with their Video
> Collection suite (video production, audio post, DVD publishing). Does
> the Sony suite compare?
As Richard pointed out, you're not likely to find someone with
experience with recent versions of both. I tried Premiere several revs
back and didn't like it, not at all. I tried Vegas Video 3.0 and never
looked back. Still upgrading and using it on a daily basis. I guess it
would be fair to say both fill the needs of advanced amateurs or pros,
and both have things that need to be improved.
As for the sig, sorry if I seemed to be the jack-booted thug of Usenet.
But if you want your sig to work like it should (the way the people who
write the newsgroup reading programs designed it) it's two dashes, one
space, then a return. All other variations do not register with the
programs as a sig and not automatically stripped from replies, nor are
they displayed as a sig but part of the message.
--
See, doesn't this look different from the rest of the message?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|