|
|
Posted by :::Jerry:::: on 12/10/05 11:48
"Argo22" <markrc@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134105088.799987.215160@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi.
>
> Just getting into the video editing/archiving/conversion game, and
was
> wondering what kind of input device to have. A friend at work
> recommended the ADVC-100 since he has one and loves it. He
recommended
> it over tv tuner cards because it doesnt loose sync with
audio/video or
> loose frames, which i have had happen with my ATI All in wonder
when
> trying some conversion in the past.
>
> Just wondering, if the ADVC-300 is worth the money or not. i know
it
> has a few features built in to help clean the video signal as it is
> being brought in to the pc, but are these worth the extra cost? I
will
> buy the 300 if it is worth it, but just wondering if the
enhancements
> over the 100 are worth the $$$$, or if the 100, with an external
device
> such as a tbc would be better.
>
If you are going to burn your converted video to DVD or recording
back to DV tape (you don't mention what you are doing with the
converted video) then you only need a one way converter, assuming
that you do NOT need to 'clean up' (re sync) your old VHS tapes[1],
then you might want to consider the ADVC55.
[1] in which case you are best going for the more expencive ADVC300.
--
Regards, Jerry.
Location - United Kingdom.
In the first instance please reply to group,
Email to the quoted address is deleted unread.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|