Posted by Smarty on 01/04/06 03:16

Nappy,

You are right. It's irrelevant.

Smarty





"Nappy" <noemail@all.com> wrote in message
news:B%Duf.40697$dO2.18691@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
> news:jrGdnQ5q6dzHZCfenZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@adelphia.com...
>> Nappy,
>>
>> I guess it is possible that Sony, Canon, and JVC (and the other 52
> companies
>> which comprise the HDV consortium) will indeed abandon the HDV format
> since
>> it is so messy. http://www.hdv-info.org/
>
> Regardless of what is printed at that link. They indeed will abandon it at
> some point.
>
>>
>> I would agree that compressed audio is inherently inferior to PCM, but it
> is
>> noteworthy that both Digital Theater Sound (DTS) and Digital Dolby AC3
>> are
>> much more highly compressed than HDV yet they somehow satisfy the
> worldwide
>> requirements of movie theaters, DVD distribution, and the vast majority
>> of
>> worldwide HD distribution
>
> Probably irrelevant. Let's keep the discussion to aquisition formats. Not
> delivery. BIG difference.
>
>
>

• Next in forum: Re: Close captioning after January 1
• Prev in forum: Re: recording a live concert
• Thread view: Re: That SONY HDV camera just got more useful...

[Reply to this message]