Posted by Steve Guidry on 10/20/11 11:36

Digibeta, while a great format, _IS_ compressed using a 422 scheme.


"Bill Fright" <billfright@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:CCxvf.31965$9e.9803@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
>
> Nappy wrote:
>
> > "Wondering_1" <nonono2@spam.com> wrote in message
> > news:TOdvf.40079$X25.866589@news20.bellglobal.com...
> >
> >>Thats my point....gullible uneducated public is snapping up these HD
TV's,
> >>thinking it's the best thing since bread, yet the source material is
> >>absolute crap...
> >
> >
> >
> > You can't judge source material by what you see in the stores. They
rarely
> > have clean , real HD signals.
> >
> >
> the theater stores use over the air signals to wow thier clients.
> Primarily PBS. I'd love to go check in the backrooms their and see if
> they ever use uncompressed digital like digibetacam for a source.
>

• Next in forum: Re: Digital Video has its limitations
• Prev in forum: Re: Close captioning after January 1
• Thread view: Re: Digital Video has its limitations

[Reply to this message]