|
|
Posted by Smarty on 01/10/06 19:05
Martin,
It was not a coincidence that I reacted so violently to Nappy. In a prior
exchange, he dismissed my technical argument (regarding HDV audio format) as
"irrelevant" and apparently likes to "cover his ears up" childishly when
presented with facts he disagrees with. The ability to engage in a
meaningful debate / discussion is not there. And thus I resorted to
unnecessarily rude behavior myself, for which I apologize.
Thank you for your understanding and feedback.
Smarty
"Martin Heffels" <mitch.mcNeilljn@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:c7s6s15lr0hdkq33lemlqn33aq2fg6437l@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:00:59 -0500, "Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote:
>
>>My point was and still is that conveying an email address is not in any
>>way
>>a guaranteed way of getting spammed, and certainly will not (as Nappy
>>claims) add you to "every spam list in existence".........
>
> Yes you're right, but it seems that many people underestimate the
> spammers.
> I am not saying that you or the OP are one of them, it was just a general
> remark.
>
>>I am totally offended by Nappy who offers no constructive suggestion,
>>essentially criticizes my attempt to help others, and provides a totally
>>specious claim which is both untrue and highly exaggerated.
>
> Yes, Nappy is a tough one :)
>
> cheers
>
> -martin-
> --
> Never be afraid to try something new.
> Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark.
> A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|