|
|
Posted by Smarty on 01/12/06 00:04
Nappy,
Are you somehow trying to suggest or imply that a "DELIVERY" format somehow
sounds different than an "acquisition" format, or that the fact that it is a
"DELIVERY" format somehow makes it different?
The sound quality achieved arises from the bit rate and the sampling rate.
The semantic distinction regarding how this content is used has no effect
whatsoever on the perceived quality.
Either you are screwing with words, or my B.S. and M.S.degrees in Electrical
Engineering somehow overlooked this "important semantic distinction".
Smarty
By the way, I am neither a girl, nor do I wish to change my nickname. Why
can't you argue intelligently instead of using ad hominem nonsense and
personal attacks??
"Nappy" <noemail@all.com> wrote in message
news:IPgxf.124$PL5.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
> news:4OudncA8mNulFVjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@adelphia.com...
>> Nappy,
>>
>> I listen to mp3's all the time on a pair of Martin Logan Request
>> electrostatics, a Velodyne subwoofer, and a very fine amp from Krell. And
>> yup, the mp3 sound is not as good as uncompressed LPCM.
>
> Doesn't really matter what you listen on. We have Genelec, the new JBLs
> and
> M-Audio studio monitors here..I do not have an audiophile-type room.
> Serves
> no purpose in a studio.
>
> I do not listen to MP3's all the time. Thankfully. Probably why the crappy
> audio jumped out at me.
>
>>
>> The Digital Dolby 5.1 which I hear from my DVDs and HD feeds, if directly
>> compared, would indeed sound inferior.
>
> irrelevant. Not aquisition.
>
>
>>
>> But I still don't agree with your January 3rd post, where your original
>> comment said that HDV has: "crappy audio.. to my ears the audio from HDV
>> cameras is very very poor"..........
>
> Read "to my ears" over and over if you wish..
>
>>
>> I guess I won't attempt to ask you to quantify "crappy" if you don't ask
> me
>> to quantify "excellent".
>
> I can't quantify crappy any better than you can quantify excellent.
> Suffice
> it to say that 'crappy' is the opposite of 'excellent'
>
>
>
>>
>> Since ***ALL OF US*** ultimately listen to ***ALL OF OUR DVDs, HDTV cable
>> and satellite programming" in this 384/kbit or lesser formats all of the
>> time..............I guess we can each decide for ourselves whether it is
>> crappy, excellent, or someplace in between.
>
> man.. .what part of irrelevant is so problematic? these are DELIVERY
> formats
> man!
>>
>> And in the process.........leave the HDV camcorders out of the
>> bashing.......
>
> Why? Because you take exception? Smarty.. I think it is high time to
> change
> your nickname.
>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|