|
|
Posted by blackburst@aol.com on 01/22/06 03:00
Steve King wrote:
> <blackburst@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1137779016.011498.162480@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >
> > Is it wrong of me to suggest that they make it look professional?
>
> No. However, as a teacher, it is wrong of you to not be clear in what you
> are saying. Quote: "Be advised that pros consider chromakey a very
> amateurish effect, in many cases." That is simply not a useful statement
> without further clarification, because 'pros' consider chromakey to be a
> very useful and creative tool "in many cases". If the pros misinterpreted
> what you were saying, how useful was it to the OP? Not very IMO.
>
> Steve King
About the only time it's used now in real TV, it's the weather map or
an anchor over a computer still or animation, and this is not the same
kind of CK he has in the MX20.
Remember local news in the 60s and 70s? It was the anchor CKed over
moving video, never done any more. Then in the 70s and 80s, it was the
ADO/DVE everybody overused, like a box right DVE-ing out to fullscreen.
Also never done any more.
The dopiest thing my students did was to CK behind a 3 camera talk set.
The foreground changed, but the background remained the same. All with
a cheesy glow around the people.
But I was unclear and opinionated.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|