|
|
Posted by Frank on 10/05/27 11:38
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 06:06:36 GMT, in 'rec.video.production',
in article <Re: HDV capture on under-powered PC>,
Frank <frank@nojunkmail.humanvalues.net> wrote:
>Some small degree
>of quality loss will result from this transcoding operation, but many
>people find it to be unnoticeable and therefore quite acceptable for
>their purposes, especially given that the resultant intraframe-encoded
>file is much easier to edit than the original intraframe-encoded
>long-GOP MPEG-2 HDV data.
Typo correction follows...
Some small degree
of quality loss will result from this transcoding operation, but many
people find it to be unnoticeable and therefore quite acceptable for
their purposes, especially given that the resultant intraframe-encoded
file is much easier to edit than the original interframe-encoded
long-GOP MPEG-2 HDV data.
--
Frank, Independent Consultant, New York, NY
[Please remove 'nojunkmail.' from address to reply via e-mail.]
Read Frank's thoughts on HDV at http://www.humanvalues.net/hdv/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|