|
|
Posted by Laurence Payne on 10/07/65 11:39
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:34:07 -0800, Mark <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my original post, but the footage was
>requested by a journal (you can probably narrow down the possibilities
>to two). The probability it will be used by the media is around 1%. Even
>then, we are talking about 5 seconds of footage that will be shown with
>a voiceover. Hence, it would be silly to spend weeks preparing the
>footage. Instead, we wanted to spend less than a day on it, but still
>wanted to make the results as good as possible given the limited time -
>hence the original post.
No, you weren't clear enough. You said:
"We are in a university department, and want to produce some good
video of rats performing a task - good enough for the media."
You asked the wrong question so you got the wrong answer. We're used
to this from the general public, and anticipate having to delve under
the surface to find the real question. (Or, being Usenet, we revel in
answering the literal question and slagging off the questioner:-)
But a university scientist should know better. Shame on you!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|