|
|
Posted by Marcel on 10/18/05 05:56
Black Locust <bl2112@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:bl2112-3FE3D9.00510317102005@news.uswest.net:
> In article <xtmdnU4rd7xWoM7enZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "blackhole@aol.com" <blackhole@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi experts,
>>
>> I would like to delete the wide screen movie and replace it with the
>> full screen movie
>
> FOOL screen yourself outta here. Sorry, but I will offer no assistance
> to someone who has no respect for a film makers vision. This isn't
> 1990; the days of pan & scan VHS are long gone. Toss that POS "full
> screen" DVD in the trash where it belongs.
Sorry, but I disagree. I have both movies together and am able to
compare them side by side, and as far as I see it, the full screen
version is actually the cut off one, cropped off from the top and
bottom, to make a "trunkated" wide screen version.
You can actually see this when stopping both movies at the exact same
frame on the computer, in this case, the boy walking through the attic.
His head in the full version is clear and freed up so you can see more
of the attic above and below him, more of the feeling of where he is in
that huge old attic, while the wide screen version has his head almost
cut off and almost as if in a crawl space of a crappy modern house.
So your "purist" bull is false.
And I refuse to pay an over-charged, exorbidant amount of money just to
watch a wide screen TV, when my perfectly good 31 inch Sony TV still has
as bright a picture as the day I bought it.
Marcel
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|