Posted by NunYa Bidness on 10/21/05 22:07

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:54:16 -0400, Rich <none@none.com> Gave us:

>On 18 Oct 2005 08:20:09 -0700, "Goro" <evilninjax@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>LittleOldMe wrote:
>>> Ever since HP outsourced its engineering
>>> to India and gave its executives bonuses for doing so,
>>> it has been a shit company. But hey, the investor
>>> class likes it that way, so it must be right.
>>
>>Somehwat OT, but recently at work, we got in a new batch of HP
>>printers. The design looks totally different and the workmanship
>>"seems" much better. it has some interesting features like builtin
>>wireless. My question is has there been some sort of revamp at the
>>printer department of HP?
>>
>>-goro-
>
>Don't forget to face East and bow to Canon, who made those printers
>(their engines) possible for HP to sell.
>-Rich

HP used canon print engines? Are you sure?

I thought HP made their own. They were into plotters long before any
of the other players were.

• Next in forum: Re: There's no doubt that letterboxing is a negative factor
• Prev in forum: Re: Since when did $29.99 become standard msrp?
• Thread view: Re: Is HP a company of lying scum?

[Reply to this message]