|
|
Posted by AZ Nomad on 02/14/06 02:18
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:28:40 +1100, Fish! - THE Aristocrat <tastyfish@fugu.com> wrote:
>In article <130220061940007349%nobody@nowhere.com>, nobody@nowhere.com
>says...
>> In article <qj32v1p9l2e7cak6d78ejlcjr1j0lqhihr@4ax.com>, Rich
>> <none@none.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Did anyone really think they were going to get 2 gig of memory AND
>> > a top flight colour screen for $250? Morons. Still, Apple shouldn't
>> > have promoted the things the way they did.
>> > How can anyone watch a movie or video on such a device?
>>
>> The $250, 2 gig device with the smallest screen *doesn't* play video.
>> The $300, 30-gig one with a larger screen does.
>>
>> > Apple Computer has been hit with a lawsuit demanding that the Silicon
>> > Valley company provide free replacements for scratched screens on its
>> > hot-selling, pocket-sized iPod nano music players.
>>
>> It's plastic. Plastic scratches. God people are stupid sometimes. If
>> you're afraid of scratches, you get a case -- the Nano even COMES with
>> a free case, if you care to use it!
>>
>> I've had mine for four years. It works, and looks fine, because I TAKE
>> CARE OF MY PURCHASE. These morons in the lawsuit should consider the
>> same if they want it to stay pristine.
>>
>You've had a nano case for 4 years huh? You missed the part where Apple
>said it was scratch resistant did you?
That's a neat trick considering the nano hasn't been out for a whole year.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|