|
|
Posted by Terry on 02/17/06 14:50
Goofy cocksucking Mommy's boy.
Tell us Hammer do you still live with mom? How old are you?
You shouldn't worry. It is impossible to think any less of you than I
already do.
Hammerer wrote:
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> news:45kienF79o57U1@individual.net...
> >
> > Hammerer wrote:
> >
> > > "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> > > news:45hsiqF6nmvfU1@individual.net...
> > >
> > >>Hammerer wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> > >>>news:45cm4jF63hfeU2@individual.net...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Jack Sprat wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:09:52 +0000, anthonyberet
> > >>>>><nospam@me.invalid> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>It was a slow video of a large recording studio, and an
> > >>>>>>orchestra. Anyway, anyone know which artiste it could have
> > >>>>>>been? It had a traditional orchestral backing, with a very
> > >>>>>>deadpan male vocal. - In fact the lyrics were pretty much spoken.
> > >>>>>>Anyway, any other ideas?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Could be the David Bowie/Bing Crosby duo??
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Nope that has Bowie and Bing in the video.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>He could have a point there, anthonyberet. Despite the fact that
> > >>>there's two of them in the video; they sing rather than speak the
> > >>>words; there's hardly any deadpan-ness in the performances
> > >>>(though some would argue); there's no visual sign of a recording
> > >>>studio or orchestra; and the song they're singing isn't 'White
> Christmas'.
> > >
> > >>>Apart from those small differences, Jack could have hit the nail
> > >>>on the head.
> >
> > >>>>- Wasn't their effort The Little Drummer Boy anyway?
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>It certainly wasn't 'White Christmas'. This thread has been most
> insane.
> > >>>Very refreshing. Jack Sprat and D. Kirkpatrick should de-lurk more.
> Yes.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>Incidentally, there were about 1183 versions of White Christmas
> > >>on that site that Petersen recommended. That is more than 542
> > >>which is what you said.
> > >>
> > >
> > > You're not wrong there, anthonyberet. It's considerably more than I
> said.
> > > It's . . . . well, hundreds more, at least. It just goes to show,
> doesn't
> > > it?
> > >
> > >>In fact, in my opinion 1183 versions is thousands,
> > >>
> > >
> > > As you know, I respect your opinion, anthonyberet, even when I don't.
> 1183,
> > > if I'm not mistaken (and, unlike the 'White Christmas' versions fiasco,
> I'm
> > > not) is *1* thousand, and spare change. Hundreds, in other words. So, in
> a
> > > way, despite my shite attempt at researching the versions, I'm still up
> on
> > > the deal, if you think about it.
> > >
> > >>and so they truly do outnumber the milkmen in Grimsby.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I'll have to take your word on that, anthonyberet. I don't have those
> > > demographics at hand. One thing I don't understand, though, is where
> > > Grimsbians get their dairy products. They must have shops, or something,
> > > there, despite what I hear of the dire financial straits they're all in.
> > > Good luck to them, I say.
> > >
> > >
> > and the atoms!
> >
>
> Absolutely! Good luck to the atoms as well!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|