Posted by fred-bloggs on 10/03/85 11:40
anthonyberet <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in news:45v2e7F8mnkoU1
@individual.net:
> fred-bloggs wrote:
>> "B:L" <blatinolito@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:KYOdnTQf2daAgWfeRVn-iA@comcast.com:
>>
>>
>>>Doesn't the new version of WinMX eliminate the need or use for primary
>>>and secondary connections?? Aren't they all the same now??
>>>
>>>OK maybe I am mistaken but I was sure that I read that somewhere.
>>>
>>
>>
>> That's incorrect. Primaries are more necessay than ever.
>>
>>
> Can I ask on what you base that assertion?
> (not that I disagree necessarily).
I used to have 4 secondaries, last time I looked it was 12.
--
fred
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|