|
|
Posted by anthonyberet on 10/05/08 11:40
fred-bloggs wrote:
> anthonyberet <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in news:45v2e7F8mnkoU1
> @individual.net:
>
>
>>fred-bloggs wrote:
>>
>>>"B:L" <blatinolito@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>news:KYOdnTQf2daAgWfeRVn-iA@comcast.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Doesn't the new version of WinMX eliminate the need or use for primary
>>>>and secondary connections?? Aren't they all the same now??
>>>>
>>>>OK maybe I am mistaken but I was sure that I read that somewhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>That's incorrect. Primaries are more necessay than ever.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Can I ask on what you base that assertion?
>>(not that I disagree necessarily).
>
>
> I used to have 4 secondaries, last time I looked it was 12.
>
so... the density of your data store is improved, the search horizon of
all peers within range of your primary has improved. The number of fake
files experienced by those other peers might now be reduced...
What's the problem?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|