|
|
Posted by NunYa Bidness on 10/26/05 21:37
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:00:07 -0700, Richard <richard@nospam.edu> Gave
us:
>The "ONE" reference was half the god damn article, the several
>paragraphs I quoted earlier in this thread, which you simply ignored.
>One more time...
No. It referenced using different wattage bulbs, just like I said
NOT changing the wattage being sent to the bulb.
There was only ONE reference to actually changing the feed to a bulb.
All the rest (most of the article) was about using lower wattage bulbs
in place of the correct bulb requisite. That isn't the same as
turning one down, as was suggested by the OP.
That is not what the guy in the post said! Just like I said in my
first response. Nothing has changed.
Get some skull-o-sucktion done to thin out the skull, and make some
room in there.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|