|
|
Posted by doc on 02/24/06 05:54
i agree on the Panasonic. we tested Sony, Panasonic, and Canon, and by far
the Panasonic had the other two beat hands down for the money, let alone the
quality of the output, consistency, and ease of operation was by far the
best. Also, there's a lot of 'em out there to work with. AND . . more
importantly, the broadcast industry was a big help since 90% of those we
spoke with were ALL using Panasonic cameras and gear both DVC Pro and DV.
They take our DV direct even :o) their Panasonic players take both formats.
doc
"Martin Heffels" <mitch.mcNeilljn@sprint.ca> wrote in message
news:vn9vt1dt7pui8r2mfb7q6j56e41io157no@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:48:26 GMT, "David McCall"
> <david.mccall@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>If you were shooting a spot, you could likely do the whole thing
>>on just 1 P2 card.
>
> That's like shooting a commercial on a 1000ft roll of film :)
>
>>It may not matter though, perhaps it is not such a cool
>>camera after all. My only experience was seeing all 3 at a
>>small trade show and the Panasonic looked cleaner to me,
>>and I liked the idea of the P2 cards and the versatility of
>>the camera. We will have to see how it plays out.
>
> The Panasonic can record the highest quality, and the Canon is a nice
> camera as well. I think Sony and JVC will loose this round in the higher
> end of HDV-camera's.
>
> cheers
>
> -martin-
> --
> Never be afraid to try something new.
> Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark.
> A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|