|
|
Posted by Rich on 10/04/49 11:30
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:37:34 GMT, NunYa Bidness
<nunyabidness@nunyabidness.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:00:07 -0700, Richard <richard@nospam.edu> Gave
>us:
>
>>The "ONE" reference was half the god damn article, the several
>>paragraphs I quoted earlier in this thread, which you simply ignored.
>>One more time...
>
> No. It referenced using different wattage bulbs, just like I said
>NOT changing the wattage being sent to the bulb.
>
> There was only ONE reference to actually changing the feed to a bulb.
>All the rest (most of the article) was about using lower wattage bulbs
>in place of the correct bulb requisite. That isn't the same as
>turning one down, as was suggested by the OP.
>
> That is not what the guy in the post said! Just like I said in my
>first response. Nothing has changed.
>
> Get some skull-o-sucktion done to thin out the skull, and make some
>room in there.
Once upon a time, the studios and the theatre chains had
money. They could have introduced digital in a big way,
they could have produced better film showing devices or
at least used them as they should have been used. A live
projectionist to monitor problems that could occur with the automated
systems they have. But, they didn't do any of this.
Instead, they cheapened everything, right down to the poor development
of the film stock we often see now. THX-equipped theatres became a
joke, especially when you can actually hear the DIALOG from a movie
next door!
So what happened?
People flocked OUT of the theatres and to DVD when they realized they
could watch pristine copies of movies on their big home theatre
TVs.
Just as the TV networks dragged their feet on adopting digital and HD
and lost out to the cable companies, so too are the theatres now
paying the price. People have voted with their feet.
The studios and theatres are now getting EXACTLY what they deserve.
Greed f------ ass-----.
-Rich
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|