|
|
Posted by teem on 10/29/05 19:24
why bother putting hem on dvd after up to 20 years afterwards?.On Fri,
28 Oct 2005 03:55:03 -0400, Invid Fan <invid@localnet.com> wrote:
>In article <W5g8f.26758$E17.14984@fe03.lga>, Derek Janssen
><djanss@nospam.charter.net> wrote:
>
>> The Man With No Name wrote:
>> >
>> >>>After putting up with all the unecessary crap on a
>> >>>dvd,spanish,french,languages,why can't the deleted scenes be placed in
>> >>>the movie? Stripes did this,& it was brilliant.While I like the Blues
>> >>>Brothers,their deleted scenes were slipped in,I forget where?.
>> >>
>> >>Often scenes are deleted for a reason, and the movie works best without
>> >>them.
>> >
>> > Depends what the reason is.
>> >
>> > In a lot 2+ hour movies, they're deleted because the movie is already too
>> > long to sit through in a theatre. But, on DVD, movies can be much longer
>> > without frustrating the viewer (just look at how quickly most people get
>> > through entire seasons of TV shows and miniseries on DVD.)
>>
>> While in others, entire extraneous characters are deleted completely
>> from the storyline, and restoring their scenes would mean one more actor
>> who'd have to be paid...
>>
>They're paid anyways if the scenes are included in the 'Extras' section
>I'd assume (and they don't take salery away from actors if their scenes
>are cut).
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|