|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 03/08/06 06:20
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:42:12 GMT, glenzabr@nospamnope.xmission.com
(GMAN) Gave us:
>In article <070320061222598138%heinrichg@hotmail.com>, Heinrich Galland <heinrichg@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <mger02h77g7fddafq1gv1ovijpb3gmdbqn@4ax.com>,
>><nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Think again. I was the one who though the same also. But after
>>> watching the Good Night, Good Luck DVD on Saturday night and the HD
>>> broadcast of Oscar on Sunday night, I saw tremendous improvement in
>>> picture quality on the few clips of the same movie. Skin texture is a
>>> lot more detail on the HD clips that you can almost see the sweat
>>> gland on Murrow?s face.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That?s only on my low end Sony RPTV from 3 years ago, I wonder how
>>> much more detail the high end plasma or DLP sets will reveal. BR/HD
>>> DVDs will be even better than HD broadcast that I think most people
>>> with a HD set will jump into BR/HD camp sooner than you might think.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>Well, I know I won't until there a "combo" player or until one format
>>is a clear winner. I'm not doing another Betamax!!
>>
>>
>>Heinrich
>Thats fine, and its the same thing i am doing. Sitting back and waiting to see
>who wins first. But to say betamax like it is a bad thing is wrong. Many here
>wish that beta had won out. It was clearly the better quality of the two tape
>formats.
Not if one factors in cost of ownership.
Why do you think VHS won? It was sufficient quality for the
monitors of the day, and was WAY cheaper.
Sony made the same mistake that IBM made with "micro-channel".
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|