|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 03/08/06 14:56
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:39:30 +0000, T1001 <nobody@nowhere.com> Gave
us:
>Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>>
>>>That?s only on my low end Sony RPTV from 3 years ago, I wonder how
>>>much more detail the high end plasma or DLP sets will reveal.
>>
>>
>> Plasma? Hahahaha. DO you know anything about hi resolution video?
>>
>>
>
>What's wrong with Plasma? Apart from being slightly less bright that LCD
>aren't they supposed to have better colour reproduction than LCD?
They have HUGE gaps between their pixels. 100% noticeable by anyone
with half a brain and half an eye for detail. I reiterate my feeling
that you are clueless in the arena of high resolution video display
technology. Plasma is NOT high resolution.
CRT is still king, and still beats even DLP. The only reason it is
going the way side is the cost and problems associated with making
large scale picture tubes. Your basic modern computer CRT is way
better than any LCD DLP or other FPD technology display.
The highest resolution FPD there is is a IBM monitor that has 19
million pixels. It is OLED technology, and is used by the motion
picture industry because at it's highest resolution, it only has a 24
fps refresh.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|