|
|
Posted by doc on 03/18/06 20:52
studio 9 far more stable? that's a long shot. we couldn't get it to
install on one machine, crashed often on two others, and the one would run
for a maxium of 8 minutes. studio 8 was unstable but at least one could
learn what made it crash and keep it running.
drd
"nappY Si" <nlei123@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:KP31SK6738794.5150694444@anonymous.poster...
> http://www.dmnforums.com/cgi-bin/readwholethread.cgi?forum=dmn_reviews&post=060125004002.htm&toppostid=1788
>
> FROM: 1071PETE
> DATE: Mar. 11, 2006 4:36 pm
> I have been with Studio from the early days, and when it works,
> it is really good. But it has been a real struggle, to be fair I
> should have ditched a long time ago. 10 Plus was and still is a
> disaster, even with the 10.5 patch. I know my way round a PC,
> but had little free time so had my dedicated system set up with
> 10 by a professional, the machine updated where needed, in fact
> more than twice the recomended spec, all tuned by a specialist
> company, Pinnacles agent, mind you. I ought to have taken the
> hint, as they were not too happy working with Studio, but I
> guess they did not want to turn away business.
>
> I have gone back to version 9, it is far more stable.
>
> Pinnacles/Avid have a real nerve in offering for sale to a
> public who in the main are probably not PC saavy, a piece of
> merchandise that clearly does not do what it says it will do. To
> me, it is totally unacceptable, dishonest, immoral, and if
> tested in a law court, probably illegal.
>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|