|
|
Posted by Mr. Moe on 03/18/06 15:20
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 05:37:05 GMT, "Bernie Woodham"
<birnhamwood@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
><littlejoeflub@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1142658594.821814.276230@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> jayembee wrote:
>>> littlejoeflub@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>> > Has the thought that maybe it's a copyright issue that is keeping Song
>>> > of the South from being released on DVD been brought up yet? The
>>> > copyright for the character of Mickey Mouse came up a few years ago,
>>> > sending Disney running to Washington to renew it. This movie, along
>>> > with the park attractions, is based on the Uncle Remus tales by Joel
>>> > Chandler Harris, who's estate probably still holds the copyrights to
>>> > all the stories and characters. Disney obviously had to buy the film
>>> > rights for the characters from Joel Chandler Harris before they could
>>> > even begin production on Song of the South. They would also have had
>>> > to negotiate for any future big-screen theatrical and tape releases
>>> > after the initial release. It's possible Disney does not have the
>>> > rights to enable distribution on DVD format, unless they had put in a
>>> > clause in the contract back when they first negotiated for vhs tapes
>>> > over twenty years ago for any future media formats within a certain
>>> > period of time. Maybe Joel Chandler Harris' family is really greedy
>>> > and holding out for a bigger slice of rubarb pie. Even the park
>>> > attractions must score them some dough annually.
>>>
>>> Did it ever occur to you that if that was the case, then Disney would
>>> have the easiest out on the face of the Earth for not bringing the
>>> film out on DVD? That if that was the reason why they couldn't release
>>> it, they'd just *say* so, instead of mumbling all sorts of excuses
>>> about "racial sensitivity"?
>>>
>>> -- jayembee
>>
>> If you were running Disney, would you go out an announce to the general
>> public and your competitors "that" reason. It would be financial
>> suicide for Disney. The number of bootlegs or "unofficial" releases on
>> the market would skyrocket overnight, decreasing the potential value
>> for a legitimate release by Disney at a future date.
>>
>
>What difference does it make WHAT reason they give? Song of the South is
>heavily bootlegged now.
>
>Also, by saying it was over racial or cultural sensitivities they have made
>the issue very political which has helped people to justify buying a
>bootleg.
>
I just picked up a copy of "Song Of The South" on eBay for ten dollars
and some change. I checked the feedback and the people that bought it
from this guy raved about it. It is complete, including the "tar baby"
scene, and it gives you some sort of 'hidden' extra cartoon. I ordered
it last night, and he popped it right into the mail...Priority mail.
I'm keepin my fingers crossed.
Here's the link:
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQfgtpZ1QQfrppZ25QQsassZcoloradophilly
The seller's eBay name is "coloradophilly"
Mr. Moe
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|