|
|
Posted by Dick Sidbury on 04/05/06 00:45
In article <sYadnSBIKJTq46_ZRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
"Richard C." <post-age@spamcop.net> wrote:
> "Jay G." <"Jay "@tmbg.org> wrote in message
> news:gwonom3p6ae7$.1qgf3s1k4edd0$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 11:03:40 -0400, Dick Sidbury wrote:
> >
> >> Is it 2.35 to 1?
> >> The previous version was formatted to fit 16x9, and for that reason I
> >> didn't buy it. Amazon and IMDB claim the new one is 2.35 but I they are
> >> not always reliable.
> >
> > The previous release was 2.35:1 as well. You may have gotten it confused
> > with Cronenberg's Crash, which was released on DVD in 1.78:1.
> >
> > -Jay
> ==========================
> Very strange..
> I think the confusion on the Haggs' Crash comes from this wording on the box
> of the original release:
> "Presented in Widescreen.....formatted from the original 1.85:1 version in
> which the
> film was shot" (whatever that means). It is indeed 2.35:1.
>
> So just WHAT is the difference with the new release?
Yes that is what confused me on the original. Anyhow the new version is
specifically listed as 2.35 to 1.
dick
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|