Posted by Dick Sidbury on 04/05/06 00:45

In article <sYadnSBIKJTq46_ZRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
"Richard C." <post-age@spamcop.net> wrote:

> "Jay G." <"Jay "@tmbg.org> wrote in message
> news:gwonom3p6ae7$.1qgf3s1k4edd0$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 11:03:40 -0400, Dick Sidbury wrote:
> >
> >> Is it 2.35 to 1?
> >> The previous version was formatted to fit 16x9, and for that reason I
> >> didn't buy it. Amazon and IMDB claim the new one is 2.35 but I they are
> >> not always reliable.
> >
> > The previous release was 2.35:1 as well. You may have gotten it confused
> > with Cronenberg's Crash, which was released on DVD in 1.78:1.
> >
> > -Jay
> ==========================
> Very strange..
> I think the confusion on the Haggs' Crash comes from this wording on the box
> of the original release:
> "Presented in Widescreen.....formatted from the original 1.85:1 version in
> which the
> film was shot" (whatever that means). It is indeed 2.35:1.
>
> So just WHAT is the difference with the new release?

Yes that is what confused me on the original. Anyhow the new version is
specifically listed as 2.35 to 1.

dick

[Back to original message]