|
|
Posted by doc on 04/05/06 20:08
it's interesting to note that when someone doesn't want to believe the true
and correct data, they always turn to: "it probably wasn't reported" during
periods where data doesn't support there claim that there isn't a God or
that man isn't accountable to God. however, the data which we have is
weighted data both from the medical community, governernment data, and
advocacy data, all of which reveals the same curves just differnent value
indicators, but nonetheless, the same result . . since prayer was removed
from schools, crime has gotten worse. wanna know why?
simple, when one isn't accountable, there isn't a reason not to commit a
crime. you probably are thinking, "but the person is accountable to the
law," oh sure, but that dosen't stop people from speeding, stealing, and
committing crime, just makes them think around the law. but if one thinks
they are accountable for eternity, then killing someone is far more
important in the life hereafter.
data is real. interviews are real. all my interviews with repeat criminals
revealed one thing over all: they either didn't believe in God or they
didn't think about God. moreover, big time crimers who did not repeat their
crimes all had one thing in common that surfaced far above any fear of
further penence or counselling/reconstruction and that was either they found
God in prison/incarceration or after prison and beliveing that they were
forgiven for the crime and they had NEWFOUND respect for authority and
reward after death. the facts are the facts. 82% of non repeaters had that
to say. great study and i think i'll write a book on it some day :o)
drd
"Bill" <trash@christian-horizons.org> wrote in message
news:-6adnZ0hLJF6Tq7ZnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@golden.net...
> I'm quite sure your numbers on teen pregnancy actually reflect pregnancy
> outside of wedlock, which, as I said, rose because vastly large numbers of
> people stayed in high school instead of leaving to get married after
> finishing grade school, while it was extremely difficult for teens to
> obtain birth control in any form.
>
> Statistics on rape and family violence are severely skewed by the fact
> that, as I said, before the 1960's most family violence was never
> reported, and rape was severely under-reported.
>
> Since then, I have never heard a report of a decline in the rate, which
> means it must now exceed 1000%. Just kidding-- but my point being that
> most agencies that deal with certain social problems always like to report
> that their services are needed more than ever...
>
> The murder rate did rise through the 1980's. You blame it on the liberals?
> Somehow I doubt that you will attribute the decline in the murder rate
> during the Clinton years as due to Clinton's administration. You can't
> have it both ways. Either there is a more scientific explanation, or you
> just pick and choose...
>
> Charming picture of those segregated schools praying every morning and
> reading the 10 commandments...
>
> Life is complex.
>
> doc wrote:
>> hmmmmm, study the stats Bill. your wrong. teen pregnancy rose rapidly
>> shortly after the 40's and 50's. in fact, i have a number of interesting
>> charts plotted and continue to plot them (having been a political
>> activist orginating in the 50's). the incline in teen pregancy began
>> shortly after 1962 and rose rapidly, as did both minor and severe crime.
>> also on the rise after that date was child abuse, spousal abuse, and
>> rape. perhaps the sharpest rise in the history of reported statistics
>> was murder in the usa after 1962. any idea what happened in 1962?
>>
>> read on to find out . . .
>>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|