Posted by Alan Larson on 04/12/06 05:18
In article "Harlo Peterson" <me@privacy.net> writes:
>I thought that the conversion from 24fps to 72fps involved morphing from 1
>frame to the next and picking the 2 in between frames at 1/3 and 2/3 of the
>way in the time morph. This would create a much smoother movement flow than
>just displaying 24fps and jerking to the next postions 1/24 second later.
It would be smoother, but it is not done.
>Given this, what I'd really like is a 1080p72 display for movies or a
>1080p24 accepting display that properly creates the inbetween frames. I
>expect the conversion to p60 could not really be as good because of the 3:2
>conversion necessary.
If you could generate the in-between frames properly, you could
generate a 60 Hz display version just as well. The presumption that
rate and resolution conversion needs to be integral is generally false.
Alan
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|