|
|
Posted by Jeff Rife on 04/16/06 15:07
Karyudo (karyudo_usenet@yahoo.com.remove.me) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:16:24 -0400, "~P~" <bmxtrix2005@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >A film camera shoots 24 frames per second, but, it
> >doesn't have a shutter speed of 1/1000th of a second - or 1/24th of a
> >second. It shoots somewhere between. Likely about 1/20th of a second or
> >so.
>
> You do realize 1/20th of a second is slower than both 1/24th of a
> second and 1/1000th of a second, so it's impossible for 1/20th to be
> "somewhere between"1/24th of a second and 1/1000th of a second?
Math is not his strong point.
> I don't think there's any technical reason why a film camera couldn't
> shoot at 1/1000th of a second shutter speed. Other than the pulldown,
> I also don't think a shutter speed quite near 1/24th of a second is
> too difficult, either.
This is correct. Like any camera, shutter speed and f-stop on a movie
camera are merely a function of how much light you have and what effects
you are going for, along with the the limitation that you must have
everything faster then the frame rate).
--
Jeff Rife |
| http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/OverTheHedge/Olympics.gif
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|