|
|
Posted by Steve Guidry on 10/05/33 11:45
It's naive to think that you can cut together any two different brands of
prosumer cameras and expect to NOT have to do color correction. There's
just too many variables. It's hard enough to cut together two identical
make cameras with no correction !
While I'm sure that there will be a number of folks who will chime in with
some version of "we do it all the time". That's well and good for them.
But the truth of the matter is that it's a crapshoot. Maybe you'll come up
7's. But it's just as likely that you'll crap out.
Steve
"Specs" <No.Spam@Thanks.com> wrote in message
news:444656fe$0$2541$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
>
> "Mike Kujbida" <kujfam@xplornet.com> wrote in message
> news:1145457347.077610.143790@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > mv@movingvision.co.uk wrote:
> > >
> > > Would I prefer a PD170 (not PD150) to any other small chip DV
including
> > > the XL2, the DV100 and the JVC DV500? Without a doubt!
> >
> >
> > Is the PD170 that much better than the PD150?
> > The reason I ask is that I did two 2-cameras shoots earlier this year
> > with my JVC 550 and a DVX100 on the first shoot and the same JVC and a
> > PD150 on the second shoot.
> > The DVX100 was a very close match to my JVC but I had to colour correct
> > almost every single shot from the PD150 as it wasn't even close :-(
> >
> > Mike
> >
> The PD170 is a slightly more refined PD-150. Peerless low light
> performance, less noisey audio section, finer steps on the iris, er two
tone
> colour scheme.
>
> Records the images with that tell-tale "Sony" look. Always cuts nicely
with
> Sony's large format DVCAMs and DigiBeta cameras. But problematic if you
are
> cutting with other manufacturers' looks as you pointed out.
>
> A fine camera.
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|