|
Posted by Jeff Rife on 10/06/47 11:45
Mattinglyfan (nospam@bigmommashouse.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> Yes but the fact of the matter is that the lowest composite score on the
> site is not 50%.
Sorry I didn't do an exhaustive search to find 3 out of several hundred.
> So a PSP game that receives a 50% is still better than a
> PS2 game that receives a 40%
"Better than" == "not as crappy as" in this case, because basically 50%
means "crappy". If you can't see how ratings that are all very high show
that a 70% game isn't particularly good, then you don't understand the
concept of relative ratings.
--
Jeff Rife |
| http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/RhymesWithOrange/CatsAndDogs.jpg
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|