Posted by Jeff Rife on 01/16/47 11:45

Mattinglyfan (nospam@bigmommashouse.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> Yes but the fact of the matter is that the lowest composite score on the
> site is not 50%.

Sorry I didn't do an exhaustive search to find 3 out of several hundred.


> So a PSP game that receives a 50% is still better than a
> PS2 game that receives a 40%

"Better than" == "not as crappy as" in this case, because basically 50%
means "crappy". If you can't see how ratings that are all very high show
that a 70% game isn't particularly good, then you don't understand the
concept of relative ratings.

--
Jeff Rife |
| http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/RhymesWithOrange/CatsAndDogs.jpg

[Back to original message]