|
|
Posted by Groucho on 04/27/06 05:06
"Barry McCockiner" <abc@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:260420062222188495%abc@nowhere.com...
> In article <4banqiFvclmqU1@individual.net>, Rod Speed
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Havent found that myself. Just one purchase wasnt
>> that great in the Pioneer 109, failed to burn reliably
>> at the outer edge. All the rest have been fine.
>>
>> I did get the 109 because it had a reputation
>> for burning almost anything fine tho.
>
> The Pioneer drives *are* really good -- I think you just got some real
> crap media that would have been unreliable in any burner.
By who's criteria ? Yours? The 109 was fine but the 110 was crap, with well
documented unresolved problems as far as burning a lot of 16x media at 16x.
The 111 is too new and firmware still immature.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|