|
|
Posted by gregfarr on 04/29/06 11:50
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:54:19 +0100, "Hammerer"
<hammerer@hammering.com> wrote:
>
>"gregfarr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:vr7552p52doabehtvkcufin4v014obs5j3@4ax.com
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:14:22 +0100, "Hammerer" <hammerer {AT}
>> hammering {DOT} com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > "gregfarr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > news:sv835214ic2vlvh1r8fnckmitb0liv7974@4ax.com
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:27:03 +0100, "Hammerer"
>> > > <hammerer@hammering.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > "nascartrekkie3" <nascartrekkie3@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > > > news:8MqdnQUqTpp3CM3ZnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@comcast.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
>> > > > > news:1146083564.034059.183560@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > This is the oldest internet scam on the planet - itself a
>> > > > > > rip-off of the old "Sir Francis Drake Will Scam" which has been
>> > > > > > around for about $150 years. What rock have you been hiding
>> > > > > > under?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Wow! 150 dollar-years? That's like, what, 15 dime-decades?
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Nonsense. What Fats is clearly trying to say is that, in his
>> > > > opinion, Sir Francis Drake will scam the Planet Internet for the
>> > > > pricely sum of 150 dollars per year, which is a rip-off. Then
>> > > > something about rocks and hideouts. I wasn't paying attention, to
>> > > > be honest.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Can't you train some of your uncivilized troops. Name calling?
>> > > They must still need to be potty trained.
>> > >
>> >
>> > I know, Greg. I noticed that too. Usenet is, alas, full of troublemakers
>> > like those guys, always ready to pounce on some innocent poster who
>> > reposts unsnipped, off-topic spam to MP3 newsgroups. I've tried to
>> > train them how to be polite and nice to people, but obviously the
>> > lessons haven't "taken". I blame myself. The only solution I can see is
>> > to get "American" on them all and do a "number 9" on their "asses", or
>> > whatever it's called. Are you in?
>> >
>>
>> don't need any butt buddies.
>>
>I'm glad to hear it, Greg. The situation would have been far worse if those
>guys who called you names also turned out to be the homosexuals, wouldn't
>it? This newsgroup has problems enough without butt buddies getting
>involved, eh?!
>>
>> Look, spam, hardly, it was meant to be funny or informative.
>>
>You don't have to tell me, Greg. I found it to be very funny, though perhaps
>not in the way you intended. Have you got in touch with Charles?
You mean the disreputable, who sent out the spams, No. Just hope no
dumb folks fall for it.
Greg
http://gregsplace.50megs.com
http://www.picturetrail.com/fugitive1
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|