|
|
Posted by Allan on 10/02/21 11:46
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:50:11 GMT, Jeff Rife <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote:
>Allan (Spamsuckhard@finallykantica22admitstobebrianlamb.org) wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>> >> Reviews that I have read state that it "is" better than existing
>> >> upconverting DVD players....
>> >
>> >I find that unlikely. Anything they do in the way of processing for
>> >upconversion is available to standard DVD players.
>>
>> Jeff.... did you see these?
>
>What part of "anything they do in the way of processing for upconversion
>is available to standard DVD players" don't you understand?
So... all upconverting DVD's are EXACTLY THE SAME. Interesting.
My point was a pretty simple one, early reviews say it's great
upconverting machine, and just another reason to buy it.
>Stop posting the same three references over and over.
Posted them once because I was asked to provide proof... and the
second time because I didn't think you read them.
Still don't.
> I'm sure anybody
>that wanted to could find reviews that go the other way,
Yeah... lets see them.
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|