|
|
Posted by Jeff Rife on 10/02/16 11:46
Allan (Spamsuckhard@finallykantica22admitstobebrianlamb.org) wrote in alt.video.dvd:
> >What part of "anything they do in the way of processing for upconversion
> >is available to standard DVD players" don't you understand?
>
> So... all upconverting DVD's are EXACTLY THE SAME. Interesting.
Boy, you just can't read, can you?
If they are doing something "new" and "special" in the HD-DVD players
for upconvert, it will be available in a few months in a standard DVD
player that upconverts.
> >Stop posting the same three references over and over.
>
> Posted them once because I was asked to provide proof... and the
> second time because I didn't think you read them.
I read three snippets where one guy says it's "some of the best I've
ever seen" with nothing as a reference. So, he's saying it's not crap,
which is what I would expect from a $500 upconverting DVD player.
Then, we have one guy comparing it to a Sony 9100ES, which is definitely
nowhere near the best upconversion (although it is good).
Last, we have this glowing endorsement:
"...looked a little better than other upconverting non-HD players
i've seen. I cant say it looked as good as true Hd source DVD but
is was more than acceptable."
Wow, get out my checkbook.
>> I'm sure anybody
>> that wanted to could find reviews that go the other way,
>
> Yeah... lets see them.
How about *every* one of those reviews you listed and the quality of
upconversion over component video? Since the HD-A1 doesn't do it at
all, there are many, many upconverting DVD players that look a lot
better.
Again, if you read around AVS Forum, you'll see that nobody who is
serious about getting quality from upconverting DVDs will use a CE player
to do so.
--
Jeff Rife | "What kind of universe is this where a man can't
| love his fake wife's mother's best friend?"
|
| -- Ned Dorsey, "Ned and Stacey"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|