|
|
Posted by Steve King on 05/04/06 15:37
<mv@movingvision.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ZVgPu6GyfhWEFwpT@movingvision.demon.co.uk...
> In message <1146743458.946484.245630@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>, Bernie
> <bernard.newnham@ntlworld.com> writes
>>It's the results that matter, not the machinery used to get them - and
>>this email feels like one of those "mine's bigger than yours" things....
>>
>
>
> There's a few here who have substantial broadcast production systems that
> would cost well in excess of $200,000.
>
> Mines definitely bigger than Leonard's and includes three powerful PC
> suites with both Premier Pro and Canopus Edius plus a lap top with both
> editors installed too. We also run a community facility with a G5/FCP 5.
> and two PD170's
>
> Due to the still developing HD options we only carry several HDV types
> including Z1, A1 and GYHD101 and hire anything else as required. Though we
> still use a DSR500WS. VCR's include PVW2800, DSR 85, Hi8, HDV, Umatic SP
> and shared access to Digi Beta and SX. HDCAM is hired in.
>
> Lots of Grade 2 studio and location Monitors and all the other audio,
> grips and lighting accoutrements required for high value productions.
> --
> John Lubran
In perfect secrecy, a few years ago I purchased the BBC. I'll post a list
of equipment as soon as get through firing a few rebel news readers.
Steve King
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|