|
|
Posted by Justin on 05/08/06 13:28
Chris wrote on [Mon, 8 May 2006 14:24:21 +0100]:
>
> "Frank" <frank@frankcoinsnospam.com> wrote in message
> news:irz7g.6646$DT5.5177@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> A seller who self insures will give you
>> your money back immediately.
>
> That is all well and good in the theory of the concept, the seller DOES
> self-insure. But, tell me Frank, if a seller does self-insure anyway, what
> is the point in advertising that fact? And before you answer, there are many
> ways to skin a cat.
If the seller only self insures when requested to, for example. It's a
hard concept to get, I can tell.
> But then, buyers who pay for surface mail, generally except an item to take
> longer to arrive. No one is suggesting Postal Insurance is the quickest
> option, but buyers have a right to receive exactly what they understand they
> are paying for.
>
> It saves a hell of a lot of hassle down the road (and the OP proves that!)
What's the fucking hassle for the OP? He got the item he wanted and it
was in the condition he expected. He's just whining because he feels he
was overcharged for insurance. Sounds more like he had no clue what he
was buying and is experiencing some buyer's remorse.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|