|
Posted by nappy on 05/09/06 02:21
"Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
news:1147140502.492459.170250@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Specs wrote:
> .
>> >
>> My understanding of physics says retentivity is the more important factor
>> of
>> the two. Its pretty rich for someone to make note of the sparcity of
>> critical information when they have steadfastly
>> refused/incapable/unwilling
>> to produce the mearest hint of information.
>
> Your understanding of physics? Are you a tape engineer? Are you
> involved in the manufacturing process? Where did you gain this
> understanding? Can you document that retentivity is more important?
> Please produce some data to substantiate this.
>
> While you're brushing up on your physics you might try consulting a
> dictionary to improve your spelling.
translation: I can't muster up a legitimate debate poibnt so I will find
something to nit pick.
Tapedick. You really ought to fuck off.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|